Many
requests are received regarding the permissible AC voltage/frequency
capability of metallized polyester film capacitors, because they
are smaller and appear to have a temperature advantage when compared
with metallized polypropylene capacitors of similar capacitance
and voltage rating. It has also been asked why we do not publish
these curves in our catalog as do some other capacitor suppliers.
The information below will help to address this question. This
information is not presented as a detailed analysis, but rather
to highlight some of the issues that need to be considered when
using metallized polyester film capacitors in AC applications.
There is no
such thing as a "perfect" film capacitor dielectric.
All have their unique "pros" and "cons".
As an example, polypropylene film has many advantages: it behaves
very uniformly and predictably over temperature and frequency
allowing suggested operating limits to be calculated and plotted.
It has very low dielectric losses. Its voltage withstand per
unit thickness is the highest of all capacitor films. However,
polypropylene has a maximum temperature limit of +105°C.
It also has a low dielectric constant, which results in a larger
physical size for a given capacitance and voltage rating when
compared with most other film dielectrics. Therefore the reduced
size and perceived temperature advantage of metallized polyester
film capacitors are strong motivators to consider their use.
For metallized
polypropylene film capacitors the increase in dissipation factor
associated with increasing frequency is determined by the ohmic
losses of the lead wires and the metallization alloy deposited
on the film. The dielectric losses are very small and do not
change. This behavior lends itself to spreadsheet analysis to
create performance curves that conservatively represent real
behavior in applications. Defining the capacitor application
thermal environment enables scaling these performance curves
as required.
Defining the
voltage/frequency capability of polyester film capacitors is
particularly more complicated because:
• Polyester
film dielectric losses are usually more than an order
of magnitude higher than for polypropylene film, and
• Polyester
film losses are a very strong function of frequency and temperature.
These film
losses are high enough to completely dominate ohmic losses in
polyester capacitors. More important, the DF behavior with temperature
and with frequency are transcendental functions that cannot be
modeled easily with a spreadsheet.
If you refer
to the Typical Temperature Characteristics graph
you will find a Dissipation Factor vs. Temperature graph for
polyester film at 1KHz. Note that as you move above +50°C
the DF starts to climb. For large enough AC voltages the increasing
losses with temperature can result in thermal runaway. It can
also be seen that for AC applications the +125°C internal
hot spot temperature limit is extremely misleading. It is very
difficult to use the temperature range between +85°C and
+125°C for AC applications because the allowable AC voltage
drops so fast with increasing temperature!
The DF vs.
Temperature behavior changes drastically with frequency. Upon
request we can provide graphs of DF vs. Temperature for several
frequencies, and describe an iterative method for providing a "starting
point" for polyester capacitor performance evaluation in
an AC application. It will be left in the hands of the product
design engineer to do the temperature rise tests under worst
case electrical and thermal conditions to verify that a proposed
polyester capacitor is indeed suitable for that specific application.
Since a very
small ambient temperature change can result in a large increase
in DF, the polyester capacitor behavior can be VERY sensitive
to the application thermal environment. That environment can
be so variable that in our opinion publishing generally applicable
performance curves would be very misleading!
However we
also realize that despite the information presented above there
are many AC applications where polyester capacitors represent
the best solution from a size, cost, and electrical performance
perspective.
We hope you
find this information useful in your design process, and we welcome
technical discussions on the suitability of any type of film
capacitor for your application. |